![]() ![]() Pierre Bourdieu's Postface to his translation of Panofsky's Architecture et penseeĪn effort of abstraction that we can see what unifies them. For a brilliant discussion of Panofsky's method as a structuralist, see It is only throughġ Erwin Panofsky, "Iconography and Iconology," in Meaning in the VisualĢ Ibid. ![]() How do we know, then, that Stevens and Apollinaire should beĬompared? We perceive at once what separates them. Methodological circle which we must accept if we forego massive evidence, and try to prove the truth of a parallelism by the truths which "It corrects the interpretation of an individual work of art by a 'history of style' which in turnĬan only be built up by interpreting individual works."2 Such is the Treating its composition, its themes, and ev en its materials "as symptoms of 'symbolical values' which are often unknown to the artist himself and may even emphatically differ from what he intended to express."' Iconology is a structural science. Iconography, apprehends the intrinsic meaning of a work of art by It mutilated meaning by considering only a part of meaning: themes, images, myths. Now Erwin Panofsky showed what was wrong with Long time, comparative literature resembled the positivistic science of In a poem beyond what the author meant it to mean, as soon as its inspiring influence has been exposed, all its meaning vanishes. Indeed conscious influenceįunctions the same way as conscious intention. MassiveĮvidence of one poet's influence on another must be handled gingerly. HERE IS NO massive evidence to link Wallace Stevens with This content downloaded from 128.111.121.42 on Sat, 22:19:41 UTCĪll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship.įor more information about JSTOR, please contact of Oregon and Duke University Press are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content #IFART ADDS THE FAREWELL ARCHIVE#Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at Published by: Duke University Press on behalf of the University of Oregon we’ve got some great new features that you are going to love.Source: Comparative Literature, Vol. Expect further refinements of audio excellence and flatulential functionality - as Comm says, "Watch for v1.1. One thing's for certain, though: The success of iFart and its fellows is no mere poot in the pan. Maybe the App Store will next feature iPuke? Or iRidiculeEthnicMinorities? Only time will tell. It remains to be seen - or detected by some other, more olfactory sense - what other directions Apple's relaxation of its guidelines may lead, seeing as how even the mildest form of sexual titilation remains verboten. Pull My Finger ($0.99): "Why must I always carry a phone, iPod, AND electric fart machine?".uFart ($0.99): "You'll be the life of the party".Poot! (free): "Shake Sensitive Fart Generator" Flatulence ($0.99): "Great for those quiet times in meetings".Whoopie Cushion (free): "A knee jerk classic prank".iFart Mobile ($0.99): "Fart Machine for all Ages".Consider, if you will, the following representative digifarts now available for your edification and enjoyment (these links are to the iTunes App Store): ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |